1/ in my opinion, the goal of good boundaries and isolation is to let you be "sloppy in the small, rigorous in the large"
-
-
4/4 But if you have tiny isolation boundaries, you're just trying to recover "rigorous in the small", poor fit for dynlang.
-
@wycats that's pretty insightful. As long as you're thinking about these things, maybe offer a simple definition of dynamic languages? -
@isaac32767 I think the answer is tautologous from the rest of my statements. Function boundaries offer insufficient tools for rigor. -
@isaac32767 it's easy to say "YAGNI rigor", but I think what happens in reality is that larger isolation boundaries take their place. -
@isaac32767 And I think that's fine. Sloppiness can be correlated with productivity in the small!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.