@brianleroux don't do what?
@polotek @brianleroux but that restriction means shared types bottleneck on standardization (the opposite of the point of npm)
-
-
@wycats@brianleroux it feels like this might be a bad idea w/ custom types. You'd be coupling modules together. Or maybe that's your point. -
@polotek@brianleroux it's common with things like http libs (shared request types) but people go into contortions to explain "bad idea" -
@wycats@brianleroux anyway, I'm not sure I'm adding much to the original convo. Just making sure I understood the core issue. -
@polotek@brianleroux JS hides the issue enough so people can say "antipattern" but it's more fundamental than thay -
-
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats *nods*, but JS doesn't even have the option of common built-ins. How often do people reach for this pattern for user-defined types?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.