The AirBNB ES6 style guide is thoroughly sensible; I found myself nodding 'yep' alot as I read it: https://github.com/airbnb/javascript …
-
-
Replying to @bradneuberg
@bradneuberg : no mention of using safe escaping for template strings. Hey@BrendanEich,@wycats : told you so.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate I'm sure you told someone so (a trait we share :-|) but what about security? Cc:@mvsamuel@ErikArvidsson@bradneuberg@wycats1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich: that's the point. I'm already seeing innerHTML = .... bugs in sample code. /cc@mvsamuel@ErikArvidsson@bradneuberg@wycats4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@mvsamuel@ErikArvidsson@bradneuberg@wycats Withholding tagless template strings would've meant they'd do same with strings.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich : but now the *new* feature isn't any safer by default. /cc@mvsamuel@ErikArvidsson@bradneuberg@wycats1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@mvsamuel@ErikArvidsson@bradneuberg@wycats Rejecting tagless template strings wouldn't reduce InnerHTML bugs. (I repeat.)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich : and, btw, I understand and agree failure is in DOM. But this is egregious /cc@mvsamuel@ErikArvidsson@bradneuberg@wycats4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@slightlylate @BrendanEich @mvsamuel @ErikArvidsson @bradneuberg fwiw I strongly object to "told you so" about such a complex topic on twtr
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@slightlylate@BrendanEich@ErikArvidsson@bradneuberg Point of order: "I told you so" is what twitter's for.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.