@awbjs Am I misreading the current draft of the spec or did the removal of bare `super()` sneak in?
@thejameskyle I'd hold off. The specifics are still in progress and we don't yet know where things will land. Very little time though :)
-
-
@wycats Hold off on correcting the 6to5 behavior to what the spec currently says? -
@thejameskyle@wycats I would love for super() to work, but as it does not today i am concerned about allowing it until the spec settles. -
@thejameskyle@wycats the fact that the spec today requires methods calling super to know their own name, is absolutely obsurd. -
@stefanpenner@thejameskyle I agree and am working on it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.