@awbjs @wycats @BrendanEich FWIW I also think that super() should be available for methods …2 ways of doing super(things) doesn't feel right
-
-
Replying to @WebReflection
@WebReflection@wycats@BrendanEich It would be nice. It would also be ambiguous and future hostile. ES7 proposals are open...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs@WebReflection@BrendanEich No. You are making a change that was not agreed to unilaterally at the last minute.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@WebReflection@BrendanEich Again, discussed at two meetings.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs@WebReflection@BrendanEich Just no. Let's take this off Twitter and do a call soon.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@awbjs@WebReflection@BrendanEich How do you not remember this? It was indeed discussed at two meetings. Notes for at least 1.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @domenic
@domenic@awbjs@WebReflection@BrendanEich I remember talking about it, but in the context of changes to constructor!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@awbjs@WebReflection@BrendanEich No, at one meeting it was related but separate point; second meeting was entirely separate.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @domenic
@domenic Yup, what I recall. Sounds like@wycats missed day 1. Were notes incomplete or obscure?@awbjs@WebReflection1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@domenic@wycats@WebReflection see https://github.com/tc39/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2014-11/nov-18.md#41-es6-draft-status-update … Notes accurately record a no-controversy review of topic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@awbjs @BrendanEich @domenic @WebReflection "super without an immediately following" bullet?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.