@awbjs Am I misreading the current draft of the spec or did the removal of bare `super()` sneak in?
-
-
@wycats@awbjs@WebReflection@BrendanEich How do you not remember this? It was indeed discussed at two meetings. Notes for at least 1. -
@domenic@awbjs@WebReflection@BrendanEich I remember talking about it, but in the context of changes to constructor! -
@wycats@awbjs@WebReflection@BrendanEich No, at one meeting it was related but separate point; second meeting was entirely separate. -
@domenic@awbjs@WebReflection@BrendanEich Was it on day 1 of the last meeting (which I missed?) -
@awbjs@domenic@WebReflection@BrendanEich well... awesome...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats@WebReflection@BrendanEich see https://gist.github.com/allenwb/53927e46b31564168a1d#file-5nakedsuperrationale-md … new^ appears only once and not as an essential part of rationaleThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.