@awbjs Am I misreading the current draft of the spec or did the removal of bare `super()` sneak in?
-
-
Replying to @wycats2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @BrendanEich
@brendaneich I mean in metods, not constructors. You remember us agreeing to remove super() in methods?!@awbjs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@brendaneich The problem is that in a function() {} you don't know if the ultimate use is as a method or as a constructor2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs the argument for removing super() was specific to the proposal that failed.@brendaneich1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@brendaneich No, that's not correct. The necessity became apparent while considering that proposal.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs@wycats@BrendanEich FWIW I also think that super() should be available for methods …2 ways of doing super(things) doesn't feel right1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WebReflection
@WebReflection@wycats@BrendanEich It would be nice. It would also be ambiguous and future hostile. ES7 proposals are open...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@awbjs @WebReflection @BrendanEich Your prerogative as the editor, I suppose, but don't pretend we agreed to this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.