@awbjs Am I misreading the current draft of the spec or did the removal of bare `super()` sneak in?
@awbjs We absolutely, 100% never discussed this. This is terrible.
-
-
@wycats not true, and it's really necessary to make super() calls in constructors work under the new scheme -
@awbjs This is terrible. -
@wycats I won't have done it if it wasn't necessary -
@awbjs We discussed it in the context of new^, then removed new^. We did not discuss doing it in the context of [[CreateAction]] -
@wycats sorry, you;re wrong about the discussion. The issue is independent of new^ and was discussed at Nov. meeting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.