The Cost of the “S” in HTTPS https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dnaylor/CostOfTheS.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @JoeBeOne
@JoeBeOne@ivanristic : the methodological issues with this paper make my skin crawl. PhantomJS doesn't support SPDY, AFAICT /cc@igrigorik2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@JoeBeOne@ivanristic no TLS False Start (1RTT handshake), no SPDY (multiplexing)... please redo with a real browser!1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @igrigorik
@igrigorik: I think this is another argument for Headless Blink /cc@JoeBeOne@ivanristic@wycats3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate YEP! Headless browsers maintained by the vendors would be UH-MAY-ZING.@igrigorik@joebeone@ivanristic1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats FWIW, here's the gecko bug. Also see@slimerjs. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=headless … /@slightlylate@igrigorik@JoeBeOne@ivanristic2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wanderview
@wanderview@slimerjs@slightlylate@igrigorik@JoeBeOne@ivanristic headless first-class envs wld let us test ember canary vs chrome canary1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@wanderview yeah looks exciting. Really, really want browser vendors to maintain these things.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.