The Cost of the “S” in HTTPS https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dnaylor/CostOfTheS.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @JoeBeOne
@JoeBeOne@ivanristic : the methodological issues with this paper make my skin crawl. PhantomJS doesn't support SPDY, AFAICT /cc@igrigorik2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@JoeBeOne@ivanristic no TLS False Start (1RTT handshake), no SPDY (multiplexing)... please redo with a real browser!1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @igrigorik
@igrigorik: I think this is another argument for Headless Blink /cc@JoeBeOne@ivanristic@wycats3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@igrigorik@JoeBeOne@ivanristic@wycats I dunno. Can't we just spend time fixing some of Chrome's many broken things first?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sleevi_
@sleevi_ : because the lack of a headless port is killing devs.@PhantomJS fails us all again /cc@igrigorik@JoeBeOne@ivanristic@wycats4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@sleevi_@PhantomJS@JoeBeOne@ivanristic@wycats big +1, I've longed argued for such a thing.@AriyaHidayat what say you? ;)3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @igrigorik
@igrigorik An officially supported way to run Chrome headlessly@slightlylate@sleevi_@phantomjs@joebeone@ivanristic@ariyahidayat1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@igrigorik@slightlylate@sleevi_@PhantomJS@JoeBeOne@ivanristic@AriyaHidayat please please please2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @stefanpenner
@stefanpenner : mostly a matter of bindings + graphics port /cc@wycats@igrigorik@sleevi_@PhantomJS@JoeBeOne@ivanristic@AriyaHidayat2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@slightlylate I hear Google just raised a $100BB round @stefanpenner @igrigorik @sleevi_ @phantomjs @joebeone @ivanristic @ariyahidayat
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.