@wycats Any idea on ETA given the circumstances? I use Firefox, it would be great if Ember Inspector would work with the developer edition.
-
-
-
@ur5us we're working as hard as we can :( -
@wycats Sorry, didn't mean to imply that you're not, it just can be frustrating at times. /cc@robertnyman@codepo8 -
@ur5us Totally agree. We've been working with the team to see if the restrictions can be loosened for Dev Edition@robertnyman@codepo8 -
@wycats Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking until I saw your tweet.@robertnyman@codepo8
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats You forgot to say console.please -
@jakemauer console.developerToolHereCanILogPlease?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats and this review took 35 days... -
@stefanpenner@wycats shouldn't something like that be caught immediately with a quick AST analysis? -
@spion If they did an automated review, yes. That said, we console.log when you click the$E to let you know what we've done@stefanpenner
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats well good thing Mozilla is really open and they're not a gatekeeperThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@wycats I see Ember's moving! when you move forward things like this happenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"The latest Ember inspector was rejected by Firefox for using `console.log`" - you've heard about it
@mepartoconmigo ? /cc@wycats -
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats@stefanpenner that’s pretty weak, especially considering the turn around time for approving addons on FirefoxThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.