@zackangelo no I am not. I suspect they will want to support new es6/es7 syntax and support it out of the box.
@BenLesh @stefanpenner @_jayphelps @zackangelo @Computed Making CPs that return a promise behave in templates for example would help a lot
-
-
@wycats@stefanpenner@_jayphelps@zackangelo@Computed I wish more templating systems would handle binding to generators -
@wycats@stefanpenner@_jayphelps@zackangelo@Computed (i.e. each next() push updates the binding) -
@BenLesh@stefanpenner@_jayphelps@zackangelo@Computed you want observables/streams not generators -
@wycats@stefanpenner@_jayphelps@zackangelo@Computed I guess what I really want is async generators. ;) heh -
@BenLesh@stefanpenner@_jayphelps@zackangelo@Computed async generators are coming /cc@jhusain -
@wycats@BenLesh@stefanpenner@_jayphelps@zackangelo@Computed https://github.com/jhusain/asyncgenerator … hopefully proposal will get to next phase soon. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
'ed this any harder, it would invert the twitterverse.