@wycats really? I heard discussion about what it would take to get there. That seems pretty healthy to me @littlecalculist
-
-
Replying to @lbljeffmo
@lbljeffmo I think spending much time on standardizing types ("manifest destiny" or no) is extremely premature.@littlecalculist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats I think we (tc39) need to facilitate moving in the direction of a std TSys. Very diff from stdizing a TSys ASAP@littlecalculist3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @lbljeffmo
@lbljeffmo I don't think the ecosystem needs or benefits much from TC39's bureaucratic stamp of approval to work on this@littlecalculist2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats Working with means tc39 pays attn so it knows before it might do sthing that gets in the way.@littlecalculist2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lbljeffmo
@lbljeffmo Plenty of ppl on TC39 are doing userland type systems. Easy to avoid future hostility without seal of approval@littlecalculist2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats Interestingly, tho, those membs want to ack JS TSyses and others seem to prefer they're never spoken of@littlecalculist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lbljeffmo
@lbljeffmo I see types as similar to macros. Have their place, but unclear if needed in the language to be useful.@littlecalculist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@lbljeffmo@littlecalculist Like anything in tech, you need some buy-in/agreement to build on top of it. Even if it's not in engines2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sebmarkbage
@sebmarkbage@wycats sounds familiar. Good thing we didn't settle on that perspective for classes or arrow or destr'ctring@littlecalculist2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@lbljeffmo but many of these are small syntactic sugar. Types are huuuuge surface area. @sebmarkbage @littlecalculist
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@wycats definitely not comparable amounts of work. But comparable in attitude of initial perception@sebmarkbage@littlecalculist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lbljeffmo
@lbljeffmo logjam more easily broken with real experimental impls with a large variety of users.@sebmarkbage@littlecalculist0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.