@domenic @bterlson @stefanpenner I think you work with much more advanced developers than I do.
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner excuse me2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @tomdale
@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner I do not want to have to teach@wifelette about mutable `this`2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette never proposed "mutable this". this binding was in TDZ until initialized1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette you have the Curse of Knowledge. "The `this` binding is in TDZ" not simple1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette Simple story: it's just like a const.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette let vs. const is not the easiest thing for beginners either, nor is `this`2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette nor is subclassing with super constructor invocation. Not novice stuff2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs Dominant proposal (cheers!) had mandatory `this = new super();`@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@awbjs@tomdale@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette Better than SuperClassName.apply(this, arguments)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@domenic @awbjs @tomdale @bterlson @stefanpenner @wifelette false dilemma
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.