-
-
Replying to @mjackson1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @wycats2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @wycats3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
-
Replying to @ryanflorence
@ryanflorence I feel we made a very clear and unambiguous statement with the Ember 2.0 RFC. Hard to misread.@mjackson@tomdale@reactjs1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ryanflorence
@ryanflorence most of@tomdale 's stuff recently on Twitter has been critiques of Flux no? I've seen some +1 on React, -1 on Flux iirc1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@ryanflorence@tomdale if people assume malicious intent they hear it, regardless of what the intent or actual words were.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stefanpenner
@stefanpenner@wycats@tomdale just look at the first tweet in this thread...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ryanflorence I think you're assuming malice here where none exists. @stefanpenner @tomdale
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@ryanflorence@tomdale malice/defensiveness … unsure why though.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.