@bterlson @stefanpenner It looks like class syntax is required, interestingly. Surprised nobody brought up that point at last TC39.
-
-
Replying to @domenic
@domenic@stefanpenner AFAIK it would have worked without the class syntax with @@create (using a factory instead of new). Now, impossible.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bterlson
@bterlson@stefanpenner yeah, agreed. Just surprised when we transitioned to [[CreateAction]], nobody mentioned this.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @domenic
@bterlson@stefanpenner (Also of course `this = new super()` works great with plain old functions, sad that was killed.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @domenic
@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner I think you work with much more advanced developers than I do.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner excuse me2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @tomdale
@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner I do not want to have to teach@wifelette about mutable `this`2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fivetanley
@fivetanley@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette too many cooks but everyone says "mutable this".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@fivetanley@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@wifelette but VIRTUAL DOM2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@stefanpenner @fivetanley @tomdale @domenic @bterlson @wifelette Virtual DOM, muuuuutable thiiiiis
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.