@stefanpenner Yes, here: https://gist.github.com/bterlson/03cbf2ab02f7e3640ba9 …. But, it turns out we disabled the old subclassing code so it won't work anywhere yet :(
@tomdale @domenic @bterlson @stefanpenner I do not want to have to teach @wifelette about mutable `this`
-
-
@wycats@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette never proposed "mutable this". this binding was in TDZ until initialized -
@awbjs@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette you have the Curse of Knowledge. "The `this` binding is in TDZ" not simple -
@wycats@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette Simple story: it's just like a const. -
@awbjs@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette let vs. const is not the easiest thing for beginners either, nor is `this` -
@wycats@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette nor is subclassing with super constructor invocation. Not novice stuff -
@awbjs Dominant proposal (cheers!) had mandatory `this = new super();`@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette -
@wycats@awbjs@tomdale@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette Better than SuperClassName.apply(this, arguments) - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@fivetanley@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette too many cooks but everyone says "mutable this". -
@wycats@fivetanley@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@wifelette but VIRTUAL DOM -
@stefanpenner@fivetanley@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@wifelette Virtual DOM, muuuuutable thiiiiis
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.