@stefanpenner No, there is now an internal-only [[CreateAction]] which does more-or-less the same thing but isn't visible to script code
@domenic @bterlson @stefanpenner I think you work with much more advanced developers than I do.
-
-
@wycats@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner excuse me -
@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner I do not want to have to teach@wifelette about mutable `this` -
@wycats@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette never proposed "mutable this". this binding was in TDZ until initialized -
@awbjs@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette you have the Curse of Knowledge. "The `this` binding is in TDZ" not simple -
@wycats@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette Simple story: it's just like a const. -
@awbjs@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette let vs. const is not the easiest thing for beginners either, nor is `this` -
@wycats@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette nor is subclassing with super constructor invocation. Not novice stuff -
@awbjs Dominant proposal (cheers!) had mandatory `this = new super();`@tomdale@domenic@bterlson@stefanpenner@wifelette - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.