Obama's statement does appear to prohibit CDNs, which is terrible.
-
-
Replying to @DrPizza
@DrPizza@BrendanEich prohibit or include in Title II? I don’t think you want to prohibit CDNs outright…2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beltzner
@beltzner@BrendanEich CDNs are functionally paid prioritization, putting fee payers onto a fast lane.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrPizza
@DrPizza@beltzner@BrendanEich CDNs are not ISPs. This doesn't make a lot of sense.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@beltzner@BrendanEich CDNs colocate at ISPs. ISPs charge CDNs for that privilege.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrPizza
@DrPizza@beltzner@BrendanEich the biggest problem with ISPs is that they are effectively monopolies. Not so for CDNs.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@beltzner@BrendanEich Meanwhile, those same rules would do nothing to end the de facto local monopolies.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DrPizza @beltzner @BrendanEich your choices are end the monopolies or regulate. As always. I'm for ending the monopolies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.