@raggi the fail cases are predominant. Success is rampant: C++, ObjC, Java 8, Ruby 1.9.2. 100% compat not required; just incremental moves
-
-
@wycats its the spec that is wrong, there is no incremental path except insanity -
@raggi every future rack story I've heard has had a compat shim idea. I would be shocked if that wasn't possible. -
@wycats oh a shim is simpler yeah, but you'd lose all benefit. i'd actually do it as a server type for rack1, rather than include in 2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats anyway, thanks for thinking about your community :-)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@wycats right, I mean who knows if it'll get done, but this is how rack needs to happenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.