@commadelimited @svpino @igrigorik @tomdale @trek what is the core metric here?
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@commadelimited@svpino@tomdale@trek adoption amongst top ~300K sites, see (and improve :)) query here: http://bigqueri.es/t/how-are-the-most-popular-frameworks-growing-year-over-year/19 …5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @igrigorik
@igrigorik@wycats@commadelimited@svpino@trek This is wildly inaccurate on its face. It ignores sites that concatenate their libraries.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomdale
@tomdale@igrigorik@wycats@commadelimited@trek this is not claiming to be scientific. It's an interesting stat. That's it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @svpino
@svpino@tomdale@igrigorik@commadelimited@trek I do indeed find it "interesting" that react grew 800% before it was released.3 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@tomdale@commadelimited@trek again. This is counting requests that mention the word "react". ReactiveBomb.js is included there.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @svpino
@svpino@wycats@commadelimited@trek It would be an "interesting" statistic if it was grounded in reality. It's masturbatory random data.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomdale
@tomdale@wycats@commadelimited@trek your welcome to ignore it, or help us fix the query.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @svpino
@svpino@tomdale@commadelimited@trek if there's a way to look inside JS files, I could help improve the query1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@tomdale@commadelimited@trek I don't think there's a way. We only have the list of requests.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@svpino @tomdale @commadelimited @trek seems like it's going to be wildly inaccurate. Like counting political votes based on lawn signs.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.