@WebReflection that exists. It's called dart. :p @wycats
-
-
Replying to @tobie1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @WebReflection
@WebReflection@tobie I believe "HTML5" used the name "HTML". They were standardizing extensions to HTML4.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats JSON's a more interesting example imho.@WebReflection5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tobie
@tobie@WebReflection Standards help implementors understand what real-world content actually requires. e.g. String.prototype.blink1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats and to be clear: I'm all for standardizing markdown and prefer that flavor to the original one.@WebReflection1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tobie
@tobie@WebReflection I sort of see the extensions as analogous to Annex B in ECMA-262: "fyi: real world content requires this"1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats that's absolutely fine with me. But might be not true of all content.@WebReflection1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.