To put it another way, there's a lot of noise, but what is the actual goal of the anti-standard argument? Is it really just about the name?
@tobie @WebReflection Standards help implementors understand what real-world content actually requires. e.g. String.prototype.blink
-
-
@wycats and to be clear: I'm all for standardizing markdown and prefer that flavor to the original one.@WebReflection -
@tobie@WebReflection I sort of see the extensions as analogous to Annex B in ECMA-262: "fyi: real world content requires this" -
@wycats that's absolutely fine with me. But might be not true of all content.@WebReflection -
@tobie@WebReflection Also not true of Annex B :) -
@wycats different choices have different consequence. It's a tradeoff. - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.