To put it another way, there's a lot of noise, but what is the actual goal of the anti-standard argument? Is it really just about the name?
@WebReflection @tobie I believe "HTML5" used the name "HTML". They were standardizing extensions to HTML4.
-
-
@wycats JSON's a more interesting example imho.@WebReflection -
@tobie@WebReflection It's similar to JSON except that JSON was extremely well-maintained and extremely well-specified in ECMA-262. -
@wycats@tobie closing the loop with my earlier tweet :-)https://twitter.com/WebReflection/status/507664249079209984 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.