@wycats Find "Luke made a stronger point:" in http://esdiscuss.org/topic/march-24-meeting-notes#content-4 …. @awbjs @littlecalculist
-
-
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist Is Luke's argument derived from "people will want to use the short form for callbacks"? Struggling...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats Gist of hazard Luke brought up: https://gist.github.com/BrendanEich/a748220b894a341bc7a3 …. Rubyists wouldn't make the mistake, JS n00bs might.@awbjs@littlecalculist3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist I buy that argument, not these other points.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats What "that argument" and "these other points"? I've only made one point throughout.@awbjs@littlecalculist5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist "it's an obvious hazard" is a claim not an argument. Claim not backed by evidence.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats So is your "it's easy to get used to the return behavior" and "it's easy to teach". Ruby doesn't prove JS.@awbjs@littlecalculist2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@wycats In particular making JS a kitchen-sink language with Ruby-ish rules to remember on top of old rules smells.@awbjs@littlecalculist2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist arrows try to provide "just enough TCP". More rules to remember (arguments? yield? super?)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats Indeed the TCP bridge can be crossed for some (not all) expression forms. Not for any statement forms in =>.@awbjs@littlecalculist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BrendanEich @awbjs @littlecalculist this makes arrows very complex for the referenced noobs. Return hazard x N.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.