@awbjs @littlecalculist @BrendanEich It seems like you said "if you're gonna do it, do it right" and others said "nah, seems weird and hard"
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@wycats No, see Luke Hoban's point. JS is statement-full. Adding block lambdas late makes wrong return bug habitat.@awbjs@littlecalculist2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist This argument is ~ "blub".2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats ISTM you're doing the "blub" thing as a recovering Rubyist. Look at if-else-value nest vs. if-return case.@awbjs@littlecalculist6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist ISTM that committee did not consider `continue` or something like it as "return from block" a la Ruby2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats Of course we did; we're not idiots, we looked at Ruby. JS has no next v. continue. You're "blubbing" here.@awbjs@littlecalculist2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist "we're not idiots; we looked at ruby" does not comport with my experience on TC392 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats More Ruby-informed discussion links: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aesdiscuss.org+ruby+block ….@awbjs@littlecalculist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist let's duke this out in person. Will likely be more productive. Want to win the twitter debate? Fine.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats No, I want you to read and search the archives for the stuff I remembered and trivially found. Gist next.@awbjs@littlecalculist2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BrendanEich @awbjs @littlecalculist you're relying on our audience not really understanding how debate in TC39 actually works.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.