@awbjs @littlecalculist @BrendanEich We can chat over beer :) I would expect break/continue to unwind back to lexical loop.
@BrendanEich @awbjs @littlecalculist "we're not idiots; we looked at ruby" does not comport with my experience on TC39
-
-
@wycats More Ruby-informed discussion links: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aesdiscuss.org+ruby+block ….@awbjs@littlecalculist -
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist let's duke this out in person. Will likely be more productive. Want to win the twitter debate? Fine. -
@wycats No, I want you to read and search the archives for the stuff I remembered and trivially found. Gist next.@awbjs@littlecalculist -
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist I concede to your superior Twitter debate skills.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats Your polemical style that is not justified. Ruby `next` v. JS `continue` discussion: http://esdiscuss.org/topic/block-lambdas-break-and-continue ….@awbjs@littlecalculist -
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist your position is that TC39 spends a lot of time not loling at Ruby when it comes up? Not my experience
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.