@awbjs @littlecalculist @BrendanEich Dynamic error when used off-stack is not as bad as it seems.
-
-
@wycats Of course we did; we're not idiots, we looked at Ruby. JS has no next v. continue. You're "blubbing" here.@awbjs@littlecalculist -
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist "we're not idiots; we looked at ruby" does not comport with my experience on TC39 -
@wycats More Ruby-informed discussion links: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aesdiscuss.org+ruby+block ….@awbjs@littlecalculist -
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist let's duke this out in person. Will likely be more productive. Want to win the twitter debate? Fine. -
@wycats No, I want you to read and search the archives for the stuff I remembered and trivially found. Gist next.@awbjs@littlecalculist -
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist I concede to your superior Twitter debate skills.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BrendanEich@awbjs@littlecalculist Ruby violates TCP via `continue` and `break`. Maybe a hazard, but better than arrows.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.