@awbjs @littlecalculist @BrendanEich Will let it rest, but I think this was an extremely unfortunate decision. Predates me by mere months :(
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@littlecalculist@BrendanEich we tried hard, was nearly in spec, but really not a very good fit to JS. Lots of corner cases4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs@littlecalculist@BrendanEich Dynamic error when used off-stack is not as bad as it seems.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@littlecalculist@BrendanEich I know ST block/return semantics well. But break/continue adds whole new dimension of issues.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs@littlecalculist@BrendanEich We can chat over beer :) I would expect break/continue to unwind back to lexical loop.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@littlecalculist@BrendanEich ... so they also need to be able to extend break/continue semantics4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs@littlecalculist@BrendanEich Again, certainly better than arrows.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@littlecalculist@BrendanEich It's slowly coming back to me. Labels were another issue. If you're going to do it, do it right.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @awbjs
@awbjs@littlecalculist@BrendanEich It seems like you said "if you're gonna do it, do it right" and others said "nah, seems weird and hard"3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@littlecalculist@BrendanEich and arrows took case of most of the current pain1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@awbjs @littlecalculist @BrendanEich No, there was an (incorrect) claim about what the pain is.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.