@wycats the loose definition of MVC has done wonders to get people to engage with these higher level patterns. Not a bad thing.
-
-
-
@polotek It also enables extremely sloppy, tar-with-a-single-brush posts like http://www.code-experience.com/why-you-might-not-need-mvc-with-reactjs/ … -
@wycats yeah. But I'm pretty sure that's the cost of doing business. The price of high level abstractions has always been losing nuance, no? -
@polotek the problem is: all of these "MVC"s have almost nothing in common. I talked about it a while ago at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1dhXamEAKQ … -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@wycats Sounds like every term related to OOP.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@wycats Don't get me wrong. I hear what you're saying. But what's the point of getting mad because people are using it wrong?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@wycats then let's unify it and come up with better names. Oh wait .. no, that's standardization and it doesn't work, does it?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@wycats I gave up on trying to discuss MVC with people when someone said Trygve Reenskaug was wrong about something pertaining to it. -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.