-
-
Replying to @tabatkins
@tabatkins@annevk not if you include the original author. That makes no sense.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tabatkins
@tabatkins there's a WHATWG book club?@wycats@annevk1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tabatkins
@tabatkins@tobie@annevk I have work to do today. Reminded that standards dramas can be a major time suck. We want the same thing.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @tabatkins
@tabatkins what's the problem? The risk of someone using an outdated spec or the "plagiarism"?@wycats@annevk1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tabatkins
@tabatkins@tobie@wycats@annevk WHATWG specs just need to be explicit they are using W3C's CG IPR policy. W3C needs to stop forks. Simple.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@marcosc @tabatkins @tobie @annevk you need membership for that policy to work.
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@tabatkins@tobie@annevk you need the same for WGs. Plus there is already a WHATWG CG, so I'm not sure what you mean?0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.