Congrats, W3C, your plagiarism confused yet another developer:https://twitter.com/antumbral/statuses/460723070743752704 …
-
-
Replying to @tabatkins
@tabatkins@BrendanEich I don't see how you can be in favor of CC0 and whine about plagiarism re: spec incorporation1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@BrendanEich The two are completely disconnected? They're committing plagiarism, not copyright infringement.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tabatkins
@wycats@BrendanEich That is, they're pretending that they published the spec, which is a lie. It's not illegal, it's just mega-douchey.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tabatkins
@tabatkins@BrendanEich they are incorporating the spec into the canon of approved W3C specs, which is what CC0 is trying to enable.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@tabatkins@BrendanEich CC0 is to enable http://annevankesteren.nl/2013/03/zero and nothing else.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @annevk
@annevk@tabatkins@BrendanEich the point of CC0 is that you don't get to decide what it facilitates.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@tabatkins @annevk I'm arguing that a decision to explicitly CC0 has meaning, nd that there's a wider context here that needs fixing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.