Congrats, W3C, your plagiarism confused yet another developer:https://twitter.com/antumbral/statuses/460723070743752704 …
-
-
@wycats@BrendanEich The two are completely disconnected? They're committing plagiarism, not copyright infringement. -
@wycats@BrendanEich That is, they're pretending that they published the spec, which is a lie. It's not illegal, it's just mega-douchey. -
@tabatkins@BrendanEich they are incorporating the spec into the canon of approved W3C specs, which is what CC0 is trying to enable. -
@wycats They're incorporating an *out-of-date fork* into W3C canon, pretending that two other people did anything... -
@wycats ...and confusing developers the world over with this bullshit. It's dishonest and actively harmful. -
@tabatkins there's a lot more going on here and you know it. Let's get the W3C licensing policy fixed posthaste. -
@wycats I'm confused. None of the problems with this are about the W3C's licensing policy. -
@tabatkins they are.@annevk does work at WHATWG and not W3C because of the licensing policy. Follow the yellow brick road. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.