http://2012.jsconf.eu/2012/09/17/beating-the-odds-how-we-got-25-percent-women-speakers.html … A great blog post on how blind review can improve gender diversity among conference speakers. #libtechgender
-
-
Replying to @ThatAndromeda
@wycats, you (and whoever else picks talks) should totally do blind selection for EmberConf (for non-core) :)@ThatAndromeda@CallbackWomen2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jo_liss
@jo_liss@ThatAndromeda@CallbackWomen in my experience (GoGaRuCo), reaching out to underrepresented groups to submit is what works.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@jo_liss@thatandromeda The outreach by@gogaruco gets paired with blind 1st round review. Pairing them matters. /@joshsusser1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cczona
@cczona@wycats@jo_liss@thatandromeda both matter. which matters more? depends on where you are weak. outreach was more impt for gogaruco3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joshsusser
@joshsusser@cczona@jo_liss@ThatAndromeda Agree with this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@joshsusser@cczona@jo_liss@ThatAndromeda are underrepresented groups also part of the blind selection process?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.