@brianleroux We don't need both. We need "hosted apps" with better offline support and more access to device hardware. @addyosmani
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@wycats offline support problems (as you know) are being worked on. I'll be more than content once hardware access is solved@brianleroux1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @addyosmani
@addyosmani@wycats hardware close for most sensors but sec model no where near close1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianleroux
@brianleroux We need all our brainpower on that, not multiple competing proprietary non-web solutions.@addyosmani2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats Totally agree, but we are getting mixed messages (at best) from other browsers. cc:@SickingJ@brianleroux@addyosmani2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@wycats To be fair, we are all forging ahead with packaged apps in the mean time. Markets won't wait.@SickingJ@brianleroux@addyosmani3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich I think the Mozilla short-term emphasis on packaged apps is a mistake. I have said this to@SickingJ1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats we are far from putting *emphasis* on packaged apps. You are worried we'll forget the web. I don't see that happening.@BrendanEich1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SickingJ
@SickingJ@BrendanEich I'm worried that you're giving cover to chrome to push packaged apps as their primary app story1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats Chrome will do packaged apps with or without us. Best way we can end packaged apps is by solving the security problems.@BrendanEich1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes
@SickingJ yeah let's do that @BrendanEich
-
-
Replying to @wycats2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.