I always love this response when you say an algebra could make an API better:https://twitter.com/wycats/status/344574266693517312 …
-
-
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh So weird to see this. I remember when I was a wee coder, merb had just come in,@wycats was on the side of bold and progressive.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuman
@neuman Twitter is a bad venue for informed conversation.@puffnfresh1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@puffnfresh Sorry, did not mean disrespect. The great are prone to eminence, and with that a lot more investment in status quo.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuman
@neuman The details of the promises discussion are pretty nuanced. Hate to see "monad" as a trump card.@puffnfresh1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@puffnfresh The funny thing is Cat Theory invoked a similar initial repulsion in the other disciplines when first introduced.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuman
@neuman I understand the monad argument but aren't sure the monad people understand the "value or promise for a value" argument@puffnfresh1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@puffnfresh The monad is clear when thinking in types. Perhaps until types have more buy-in, there will be this friction.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@neuman I like the Ref<T> line of thinking and it's compatible with types :) @puffnfresh
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.