@SeanTAllen yep - it was purposely designed that way. /cc:@pkeane
@stilkov I’m just baffled by the “only the browser is *real REST* crowd” @steveklabnik
-
-
@wycats@steveklabnik I don't consider myself part of that crowd, but yes, I've found the browser to be a very good REST client role model -
@stilkov It sounds like you are philosophically opposed to other, more special-purpose REST clients. Not REST, opinion.@steveklabnik -
@wycats@steveklabnik Not in general, no; I just have a hard time justifying a specific one where I consider the generic one "good enough" -
@stilkov the apps I build and help others build don’t have the luxury of “good enough”@steveklabnik -
@wycats@steveklabnik Fair point. For most scenarios I'm involved with, what you consider insufficient would be an amazing step forward -
@stilkov then you should use the browser as a “good enough” REST client. Unhappy with claims that of “misunderstanding REST”
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.