Something tells me http://app.net isn't built on Rails: http://twitpic.com/amih7k
-
-
Replying to @tenderlove
@tenderlove So you're saying it might have a chance in hell of scaling efficiently?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @tenderlove
@tenderlove Once, was a troll. Then everyone else got as awesome as rails was in 2007. And kept going. Now we have just have rails lifers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirinDave
@KirinDave you're right. We should just give up. :-/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tenderlove
@tenderlove It is not like I haven't been warning people for years. In public & at length: http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/06/multicore_hardware_and_the_fut.html … http://dave.fayr.am/posts/2008-11-20-the-opposite-of-momentum.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirinDave
@KirinDave huh. Your blog posts didn't fix the problems? I'm shocked.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @tenderlove
@tenderlove RUBY IS OPEN SOURCE SEND US A PATCH FOR OUR OBVIOUS PROBLEM WE ACTIVELY DISMISS WE WILL SURELY LOVE IT AND NOT ARGUE OVER IT.™1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirinDave
@KirinDave There's also anti-Rails lifers. People with a burning desire to be proven right.@tenderlove3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@KirinDave I'm sorry for calling you the Joe Lieberman of Ruby.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.