Heck, even the devs of @discordapp in their latest blog post (https://blog.discordapp.com/why-discord-is-sticking-with-react-native-ccc34be0d427 …) state how this is a "pain point" (#5).
---
That said, this thread does not mean I'll stop using my free time helping (or at least trying) to make #reactnative better.
-
-
Still, after all of this, I find it hard to "label" React Native as one or the other. It still has elements from both descriptions

-
(that said, I haven't watched yet the talk
@CodingItWrong linked earlier in this 3d so maybe by listening to it it will be clearer what you mean) -
If there is asymmetric communication, I don’t think it is straddling the definitions. They build it for themselves, let it be used, train engineers before hire, get free contributions to their codebase, all with no additional cost and licensing isolation from competitors.
-
And yet, the thesis of the talk I gave with
@littlecalculist is that they would *still* be better off opening it up, when all costs are accounted for. -
Which I completely agree with, however breaking the coda of the MBA and teaching an understanding of add sum scenarios is an entirely different conversation. Moving that needle is very hard, possible but energy intensive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

(basically I see those two extremes as no PRs vs you can PR)