This is one of those cases where the correct legal interpretation and the correct policy seem to be at odds :(
-
-
-
Not really. The national labor relations act came after, and therefore should supersede, the Federal Arbitration Act. That's what the NRLB found in 2012: https://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-story/board-finds-certain-mandatory-arbitration-agreements-violate-federal-labor … The NRLA clearly intended to allow this, and for the right to sue to supersede older laws.
-
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-285_q8l1.pdf … The discussion of that NRLB thing starts on page 8 (in pdf pages) / page 4 (printed in the opinion text)
-
Did you read the dissent?
-
Yes, and while I'm a huge RBG fan, and I agree with the likely resulting bad consequences therein, I don't find the legal part persuasive over 3 decades of precedent to the contrary. Through IANAL, only a dabbler.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Waiving basic rights like the right to sue should be illegal.
-
Completely agree.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Like we need non health or taste reasons to never eat at Chipotle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.