"Anti-vaxxers" is a term I normally don’t use. In my vaccine book I use “vaccine deniers.” But when people argue that we do not need corona vaccines, which is sheer non-scientific nonsense, it is appropriate to call them “anti-vaxxers.” https://scientificfreedom.dk/news/
-
-
Prof. Gøtzsche should ask himself why he attracts antivaxxers like this so much.
-
Uh, just like the mafia. Since PG has touched pharmaceutical interests, you try to discredit him by putting up anti-vax labels. Simple.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If the question made sense perhaps you would be able to answer it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m pretty anti-horseradish. Like, I stand solidly against it being used. Does that count?
-
so impressive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Another serving of airtight logic I see...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
An anti-vaxxer is: In opposition to vaxxers. And the vaxxers are: Some intolerant and religious fanatics. I support the development of beneficial vaccines when necessary like covid vaccine for vulnerable and elderly, and I despite the vaxxers. So, anti-vaxxer is fine with me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
