John

7/ This is why economists can’t understand bitcoin. They haven’t seen trustless money in decades! Debt is the only form of money they know. By the time they understand, it will be too late.

18/ Put differently: we wanted the internet to destroy the gatekeepers, but instead we got the most powerful gatekeepers in the history of the world.

Wow – honoured and humbled to get a mention in The New Yorker! @Cellarius2084 @ConsenSyshttps://twitter.com/NewYorker/status/1052537477515399168 …

It’s possible that both censorship-resistant sound money and permissionlessly-programmable computing platforms are going to be huge.

The potential of poor bright children is often wasted: the search needs to be widened https://econ.st/2G1dCJa 

As we said on stage, come collaborate with us in our alpha - tell your unique story about 2084! Find your voice and share it: writers, artists, vocal talent, video, animation, etc. We want to you to create with one another and with us https://cellarius.network/  #launch #ethdenver

People’s main complaint about decentralization is that it’s difficult. They’re right. Centralization is easy. Decentralization is hard. Security is hard. Privacy is hard. The UX is hard. If you don’t get the idea of self-sovereignty then these solutions won’t make sense to you.

If cryptocurrency prices declined by 90%, would this person still be doing what they are doing? This is a fundamental question to ask yourself when doing business with people in the industry. Unfortunately, the majority of the time the clear answer is no.

8/ A final thought: Crypto is a series of experiments. There is a massive distinction between a good trade, a good investment, good engineering, a good business use case, and a good experiment that moves the industry forward.

Two of the top 10 cryptocurrencies by network value don't have functioning networks.