Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @wminshew

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @wminshew

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    28. stu 2017.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    seems like there are two _very_ different potential futures ahead of us re:privacy, largely characterized by face/gait/voice recognition of AI vs zk-snarks/onion-routing of crypto; let the new cold war of Maths begin?

    Poništi
  2. prije 1 sat

    presented without comment

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    every seemingly innocent fragment of information is secretly plotting how to escape its context and cause trouble

    Poništi
  4. 1. velj

    lazyweb: what are the best books on [computer] hacking? fiction or nonfiction, 'best' left intentionally vague--could mean most interesting, engaging, informative, detailed etc

    Poništi
  5. 31. sij

    right pane multi inbox view in gmail is life changing h/t

    Poništi
  6. 31. sij

    consistent with a cohort-ocracy. Tyranny of the boomers? h/t

    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    What if, instead of granting CEOs tons of options, CEOs were simply required to have > 50% of their NW tied up in their company stock? What are the obvious downsides I'm missing?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 31. sij

    HF LPs usu require fund managers to hold a significant portion of their NW in their own fund (to align incentives). How/why did this diverge from CEO incentive alignment?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 17. sij

    what's the most rigorous, neutral analysis you've read on huawei as a potential intelligence threat?

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. sij

    Most investors don’t provide psychological safety for their founders—fear in the power dynamic especially amongst those that sit on boards. This is a bug worth exploiting if you want the best deals via the best reputation.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 14. sij

    these may even be the "right" things to do (though there were/are clearly other options), but the optics of it are just undeniably miserable

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 14. sij

    2009: people losing their homes Fed: lets bail out the banks! 2020: market repo rates go up a few points Fed: lets bail out the hedge funds! and people wonder where the populist anger comes from

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    in 2020 I'm creating and publishing 12 zines! about "the Homo sapiens lifestyle that gives us all so much trouble" 😜👍 you can subscribe to them for the price of a cocktail (SF prices, idk where you live) here:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 6. sij

    > This patient would have paid us about $2,500 to about $3,000, but in the U.S., an operation of this nature would cost, I guess, more, anything from $70,000, $100,000.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 5. sij

    [the future of work may be distributed, but humans are social creatures & most of us like living near others. Plus the shorter the average employment period, the higher the returns to living near the most dense employer/employee areas]

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 5. sij

    "can the startup get distribution before the incumbent gets innovation?" --?> "can the challenging city get tech jobs before sf scales [RE]?" since sf has decided it doesn't want to scale, feels like only a matter of time before it's overtaken..

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 5. sij

    financial services has new york tech has sf o&g has houston health services has ___________

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 5. sij

    perhaps the issue is legibility. Still too difficult for consumers to figure out & diligence all the permutations on their own

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 21. pro 2019.

    ime generally true for all future planning. What’s the easiest way to combat this? (eg prevent present you from dumping unwanted tasks on future you)

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. pro 2019.

    “You’re so wise for your age” “Thanks! It’s the trauma :)”

    Poništi
  21. 16. pro 2019.

    in all likelihood trump will win 2020 (barring some major economic catastrophe), but 2024 will probably see a relatively young candidate elected, bc voter demos

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·