"Access to sex" isn't a coherent concept, particularly when analogized to "access to income," because "sex" isn't a fungible, transferrable commodity. There's only one way to provide someone with sex: Have sex with them.https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/989535565895864320 …
-
-
check the casual ablism: people who are disabled can and do still masturbate. Just fyi
-
Hey, thanks. Excellent point.
-
appreciate that. Incidentally, disabled people are often held up as an argument that some people "can't access sex" and should be provided with sex workers, but most are doing just fine finding partners on their own, like everyone else.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'd say status rather than patriarchy (or status within a patriarchy), but otherwise this is spot on. I womansplain the problem at some length here:https://contemporarysex.tumblr.com/post/173413298382/a-hansonian-reply-to-robin-hansons-sex …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.