Amidyar also donated 55 million dollars to Clinton foundation.https://medium.com/@AngelFox1/freedom-of-press-foundation-paypal-and-the-pierre-omidyar-connection-cab7b1f19d17 …
Today, the "Freedom of Press" Foundation, which is now substantially linked to Paypal's Omidyar, has, after political pressure, decided to terminate processing of WikiLeaks' donations. Alternatives created here: https://wikileaks.org/donate Background: https://pastebin.com/raw/qnB5gMam
-
-
-
Must be a conflict of interest.
-
It is definitely and a code of ethics violation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also Amidyar gave 100k to Anti Trump super Pachttps://medium.com/@AngelFox1/freedom-of-the-press-foundation-wikileaks-threat-pdf-and-the-strategy-to-bring-wikileaks-to-its-7f0c19c89391 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I told you guys a long time ago that Omidyar's influence was nothing but trouble Bogus 'philan***ist' (a paid-for lie) whose role is akin to "controlled opposition"pic.twitter.com/yUaTsVsjBp
-
Just keeps saying to yourself you're a philanthropist,
@pierre (or pay people to say that to you) His wife "Pamela, gave $1 million to the Clinton Foundation"http://www.weeklystandard.com/conflict-of-interest-politifact-and-the-clinton-foundation-share-megadonor/article/2004689 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
shutdown
@PayPal for these kinds of activities no to#censorship#FreedomOfSpeech#truthisoutthereThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scary stuff, stay strong and crypto on!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How come Wikileaks doesn’t seek corporate sponsors like other media outlets? Just a question, as I’m unsure of how the company is funded.
-
When you start taking corporate money, sooner or later, you become beholden to those corporations. That's why
@wikileaks relies on donations from individuals seeking the truth; so they can continue to publish the truth without corporate interference.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're not press . You selectively leak to further your personal agenda
-
Opened the Washington Post lately?
-
What the post does or doesn't do has nothing to do with decisions made by WikiLeaks
-
It does if you are positing a norm.
-
The world is full of hypocrisy.. ...Wikileaks originally was an antidote to that . That's the tragedy.
-
Transparency was the objective. Not "transparency unless it inconveniences pols I like".
-
Then why has it become an outlet of Russian propaganda? That's not transparency, that's taking sides
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.