“Freedom of the press” does not include leaking of secret or confidential documents. Especially when none of the leaks relate to Russian documents!
US government on why it has decided to close its eight year long grand jury proceedings against @WikiLeaks (expanded in 2017 to cover our series on the CIA). Wait, what?https://twitter.com/StateDept/status/948284718419656704 …
0:22
-
-
-
US media publishes leaked info every day. Whats the difference?
-
The difference is real media published news and opinions everyday, majority of which are not “leaks” of secret documents.
-
WikiLeaks has been around for many years and has an impeccable record for every court case they’ve been involved in.
-
There were no ‘court cases’ because there are no people behind Wikileaks to be able to arrest and jail if found guilty (e.g. company directors or employees). Further, traffic to its site has become extremely modest. It’s no longer causing firestorms in the media.
#fact - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
CIA KIDNAPPED JULIAN ASSANGE 10/2016 Has not been seen at EMBASSY since
-
Julian is Fine! Nothing has happened to
@JulianAssange guarantee it -
He has not been kidnapped, but his twitter was hijacked , and CIA is infiltrating wiki leaks
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
#WikiLeaks#WednesdayWisdom#JulianAssange#tcot Trump’s Attorneys Make Solid Case For Freeing Julian Assange in Legal Filinghttp://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/trumps-attorneys-make-solid-case-freeing-julian-assange-legal-filing/ … - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In the case of WL its all about who the sources are not WL its self- if you were spineless self preserving MSM they would've had what they wanted already - fear not, they will get nowhere and the world now knows CIA and Deep State are the true threat
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pardon? He should be given the Congressional Medal of Honour!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, go on
@StateDept and tell us how much you like freedom of the press, which you ARRESTEDhttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/j20-trump-protests-trials-jail-threat-inauguration-demonstrations-explained-a8057521.html … -
What's the real story on this one? Are there any specific names of people detained? What were the charges etc. Are they awaiting a trial? If this is true, the American people need to have the specific details.
-
Yes, reporters and photographers were detained and put on a sham trial
-
Do you know what the reporter and/or photographer's names are? What were the charges against them? What was the result of the Sham Trials? Did any of them get prison sentances? If so, how many & what were they found guilty of?Without specific facts, this is just propaganda.
-
You can read all about it online. Thousands of articles.
-
I guess I missed the specific details. I read the article you posted. I didn't see any specific answers to the questions I just asked you about. I'm from the Show Me State of Missouri. I've got to see and hear all the evidence before weighing in on it.
-
The nasty element of it is that the regime attempted to pressure DreamHost into giving the site logs to get a list of protesters or people who showed interest
-
That's news to me. I will investigate and see what I can find out.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.