.This is nonsense. Check with the WikiLeaks volunteers who worked on this project. You'll learn WL created an online redaction engine so we could take out names of those who might be imprisoned or worse from cables we published. WL agreed on the consultation with State Dept.
-
-
-
WikiLeaks agreed to pose questions to US govt 48h prior to publication. NYT pushed for 4 days (WikiLeaks objected). The email shows the NYT betraying the entire day by day thematic publication plan to Secretary Clinton's spokesman PJ Crowley -- not asking questions.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
He’s out of the embassy!!! May God and Jesus have their hands upon his shoulders.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Isn’t it pretty bad that you guys had chosen to actively influence one specific side of the US election though? Rather than the original (presumed?) vision of universal transparency etc...?

-
She lost. She's corrupt. She was exposed. Move on..
-
We'll move on after she pays the penalty for her crimes.
-
I'm not holding my breath. If like to see her behind bars as much as anyone else, but she's one of the 'untouchables'. Above the law...
-
I'm afraid you may be right.
-
I hope so. I'm not too happy about the laws that apply to us, doesn't apply to these corrupt elites.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And you wonder "Why she wasn't 50 POINTS AHEAD!!!" She had to cheat to win and still lost. To Thee most unfavourable candidate in U.S. election history.
-
Is there anything Hillary did in politics that wasn't illegal/corrupt?
-
I could share how far back her behavior has been corrupt: “… engaged in a variety of self-serving unethical practices in violation of House rules." when she was 27 and working on Watergate.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
#NYT and all other media outlets are mouth piece of Govt and#deepstate Illusion of Free Press! Lost credibility, if there was any after#Iraq war#FakeNews#FakeNewsMedia - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Contact the DoJ today and demand they drop charges against Wikileaks and Julian Assange immediately! 202-514-2000pic.twitter.com/MKfx13ta4U
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
