NOTE: WikiLeaks has not released exploit code to the CIA's "zero day" hacking software. See https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1 for details
NOTE: The current hospital 'ransom ware' directly relates to computer viruses produced by the NSA. Not to WikiLeaks' CIA #Vault7 series.
-
-
-
You are not credible or trustworthy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know I'm just being a technical pedant here, but the NSA hasn't produced any *viruses* as far as we know.
-
It's like some asshole breaks the door of your house open without ur knowing about it & leaves it wide open for any passerby to intrude
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I was objecting to the term "NSA produced viruses". They didn't in this case. Somebody else did, using their tools.
-
In this case yes but u also said ''NSA hasn't produced any *viruses* as far as we know.'' Stuxnet was a joint US-Israël project & thats NSA
-
We don't know if the NSA was involved in the making of Stuxnet. It looks more like made by a defense contractor.
-
Ur jokin right !
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If the NSA has not produced any viruses, then why have they not prevented them.
#oopsbustedagainThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
In Swiss banks, the highest form of security is used- so I adopted this in my office- beats any form of cyber security- it'ds called PAPER-
-
Keep it all in something fireproof
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nope. NSA didn't create the virus they created the exploit.
-
& why the F... did they need to do that There not so stupid not to know that once the breach has been made somebody will exploit it
-
Haha. Do you consider that as an ethical problem? So you consider US "security" and military agencies ethical? :D
-
I surely don't !
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You should specifically mention the reckless ShadowBrokers release. They did it for a good reason but the results are shitty.
-
They didn't do it for a good reason at all they did it for money
-
No actually they didn't get any money for it nobody wanted to pay for it. They claim they did it in retaliation for Trump attacking Syria.
-
Had someone actually given them money for it they wouldn't have released it. That said it doesn't mean the reason they gave is the real one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.