WikiLeaksVerified account

"100% record of authentication"? pray, tell us how you arrived at that. how does WL authenticate leaks? how do you verify?

M8 you're smart enough to find that answer yourself. Publically stating your ignorance is not a form of commentary. No chutzpah.

well since you seem to know, how does wikileaks verify leaks? how can it claim 100% accuracy? please illuminate me

DKIM, basic cryptographic signatures, and also google can confirm via keys if content was sent as presented by WL. And:

Any compromised org could just print their verified version of emails and debunk what WL has. This never happens because WL is legit.

it never happens because it would be fucking stupid for a compromised org to confirm or deny anything WL releases

How can you call yourself a "strategist" and say something this moronic? Whatever you get paid should be cut in half

1. not all emails in the podesta dump have signatures-- thus you cannot claim they have been authenticated

Who cares what wikileaks endorses?

By "truth" you mean Assange's agenda, right?

When has wikileaks ever released certified documents and who certified them? That's just ridiculous.

Find a single certified WL doc. I'll wait...

Your credibility is shot, Comrade.

they been 100% right there entire career. Buzzfeed used a post from 4chan

4Chan...those pizzagate doors?

him and the CIA and buzzfeed. And CNN

No. READ: MI6, sent people to meet w/investigator. 4chan is bullshit. @The_Drizzle8867 @HT4Real @wikileaks @guardian