WikiLeaksVerified account

@wikileaks Yes. Millions of investigators will do a much better work than a few hundred journalists.

@jonasnuts estas a gozar? @wikileaks

@fcancio A não ser que me refiras motivos de segurança…….

@jonasnuts refiro-te as exigencias eticas e de procedimentos correctos a q os jornalistas estao obrigados.

@fcancio percebo isso, mas mixed feelings, sobretudo porque nos dias que correm a ética jornalística deixa muito a desejar.

@jonasnuts sim, sem duvida. mas as obrigacoes existem. é melhor com obrigacoes q sem nenhumas

@fcancio As obrigações e a ética existem e são usadas apenas por alguns. Abrir a todo o universo não alteraria esta situação.

@jonasnuts claro q altera, joão. o comum das pessoas ñ tem nenhum tipo d obrigação ética. ñ é chegar ali e despejar nomes.exige investigação

@The45Storm 12 million, wasn't it? @wikileaks

@JuliaJay8 my mistake, probably more than that!

@The45Storm And some still believe it was for a spurious assault charge...

@JuliaJay8 @The45Storm lol the man is accused of rape. I'm loving the Panama leaks but to suggest Assange shouldn't stand trial is ludicrous

@LeftTranslation He would have to be charged first. May I suggest you check out ABC News/Four Corners' documentary: http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2012/07/23/3549280.htm …

@Schnautomatic poor choice of words on my part, but it's impossible to charge somebody who you can't get to.

@LeftTranslation Oh come on. There's still a lot to discuss re. Assange case, I didn't think you were going to give up this easy!